影片讲述了一对处在敌对关系之中的父子的故事。父子二人都在耶路撒冷的希伯来大学工作，傲骨他们都是犹太法典的专家，傲骨而且都是颇有个性和怪癖的怪人。由于在对待荣誉和学术问题上，父子二人分歧过大，所以这两个学者之间产生了早已超越父子关系的抵牾。儿子是一个喜欢追名逐利的当代学者，而他的父亲却是一个非常严肃、非常守旧的古典派的学者。在父亲威严的外表下，他其实也是一个渴望得到认知和认同的人。父子俩的矛盾一直没有公开化和扩大化。但是，当以色列国家奖要颁发的时候——这是以色列国内奖励学者的最高奖项——父子俩的矛盾终于爆发了出来，这是一出令人苦恼而且没有结果的对抗。
回复 :高天乐与同是外资老总独女的徐雯雅已经订婚，然而开学第一天，同班的李弋南被高颜值的徐雯雅吸引，索要联系方式，却吃了闭门羹，于是心生怨气。恰巧他还被刚进教室门的高天乐夺去了风头，两人产生了一些矛盾。后来李弋南也向坤哥吐露出自己被高天乐这个富家公子哥抢尽了风头，很是苦恼。在送走了李弋南夏栀杰之后，坤哥又接到了银行下发的催款通知单，眼看着还款期限临近，坤哥心中无奈，怨气顿生，又想到了李弋南刚刚提到的高天乐，心中开始算计。坤哥因为欠下巨额贷款派人绑架了高天乐索要赎金未果，后来又策划一次绑架，绑架了女神徐文雅，高天乐得知徐雯雅造绑架，气氛万分，与李弋南一块玉绑票的坤哥展开一场搏斗。
牛嘉
回复 :1942年，第二次世界大战已进入白热化阶段。南太平洋上，日美双方展开激烈角逐，人性的底线在炮火声中被彻底摧毁。隶属美军的“查理步兵连”接到一项艰巨的任务，他们受命登陆瓜达康纳尔岛（Guadalcanal），夺回日军占领的210阵地。日军占尽地利优势，防守固若金汤。然军令 如山，即使刀山火海查理步兵连的将士们也要奋勇向前。这群年轻的小伙子为了所谓的正义投入这个残酷的血肉战场……本片根据美国作家詹姆斯·琼斯（James Jones）1962年的同名小说改编，并荣获1999年柏林国际电影节金熊奖和荣誉提及；1999年芝加哥影评人协会最佳摄影奖；2000年澳大利亚影评人协会最佳外语片奖；2000年电影旬报最佳外语片导演奖。
街头霸王
回复 :Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
