剧情简介
洛杉矶的穆斯林男子Mo与前男友分手后一直无法释怀，妹视此后他在斋月遇上了英俊的演员Kal，妹视必须在尊重自己传统的同时应对新感情，如何克服恐惧、付出真诚。
3姊妹视频
洛杉矶的穆斯林男子Mo与前男友分手后一直无法释怀，妹视此后他在斋月遇上了英俊的演员Kal，妹视必须在尊重自己传统的同时应对新感情，如何克服恐惧、付出真诚。
王强
回复 :In this emotionally charged thriller, Harper is forced to face horrifying secrets of her childhood in order to give her daughter a better future. But how far will she go to forget the past
回复 :都市中五个婚爱观截然不同、年龄亦差异较大的女人：在保守环境中长大的章迎（梅婷）人已28岁，却从未尝恋爱滋味，发誓要把贞操留到与心爱的男人结婚那夜；小章迎几岁的“白骨精”（李小璐）性情泼辣，一心要找钻石王老五下嫁；“白骨精”的好姐妹是位“富家女”（小宋佳），为找到真心待她的男人，将自己扮成为生活打拼的普通女孩；大章迎几岁的叶（邬君梅）被丈夫抛弃，携子过着惨淡的日子，十分渴望身边能有个男人作支撑；人过50的高姐（元秋）则主动将嫌她是黄脸婆的丈夫踢下床，但过了一年多单身生活后，也想身边再有个男人。持怎样的婚爱观，便会有怎样的恋爱经历：章迎在假面舞会上与“海归”的赵大（耿乐）又见钟情，恋爱谈了大半年，两人仍在肉体上绝对纯洁；“白骨精”相中某处在发展中的公司的老总（段奕宏），向原公司请假半年来到他的身边，开始拼命自造与他亲密接触的机会；“富家女”因为一道菜结识某酒店的“10号厨师”（李晨），冲着他的体贴与单纯，不计他的贫穷与他开始浪漫的恋爱，却也没忘暗中将他考验；叶遇到从婚介所拿到她资料、主动将她找上、自称在神秘单位供职的王莽（葛优），王莽为她和儿子所做的件件事都强过前夫（刘震云）一百倍，令她以为迎来爱情上的第二个春天；高姐则结识小她好多岁、经历复杂的网友（郭涛），这个男人亦一次次带给她感动，她也甘心为他付出全部。五个女人恋爱谈得有甜有酸，五个男人也渐渐显出更多面，“真命天子”里，既有上天钦赐，亦有情感骗子、有缘无分的过客和想改过自新的浪子。
回复 :The subtitle of Jean-Marie Straub and Danièle Huillet’s first feature, from 1965, “Only Violence Helps Where Violence Reigns,” suggests the fierce political program evoked by their rigorous aesthetic. The pretext of the film, set in Cologne, is Heinrich Böll’s novel “Billiards at Half Past Nine,” which they strip down to a handful of stark events and film with a confrontational angularity akin to Bartók’s music that adorns the soundtrack. The subtlest of cues accompany the story’s complex flashbacks. The middle-aged Robert Fähmel tells a young hotel bellhop of persecutions under the Third Reich; his elderly father, Heinrich, an architect famed for a local abbey, recalls the militarism of the First World War, when his wife, Johanna, incurred trouble for insulting the Kaiser. A third-generation Fähmel is considering architecture, just as the exiled brother of Robert’s late wife, returns, only to be met by their former torturer, now a West German official taking part in a celebratory parade of war veterans. Straub and Huillet make the layers of history live in the present tense, which they judge severely. The tamped-down acting and the spare, tense visual rhetoric suggest a state of moral crisis as well as the response—as much in style as in substance—that it demands.
