张米亚
发表于9分钟前回复 :汤姆(约翰·肖 John Thaw 饰)是一个性格非常孤僻古怪的老人,常年独自生活在一座地处偏远的小镇之中,他没有家人也没有朋友,整天摆着一张臭脸,拒人于千里之外。纷飞的战火席卷了大半个世界,即使偏僻的小镇也不能幸免。十一岁的男孩威廉(尼克·罗宾森 Nick Robinson 饰)在伦敦的一次空袭中死里逃生,来到了小镇里寻求庇护,就这样,命运让威廉和汤姆相遇了。刚开始,汤姆和威廉这对年龄差距巨大,个性南辕北辙的搭档之间产生了很多的误解和矛盾,但随着时间的推移,一老一少相互产生了亲情的联结。就在他们决定相依为命共同生活之时,威廉的母亲忽然出现,她要将威廉带回曾经给他的心灵带来过阴影的伦敦。
马睿菈
发表于1分钟前回复 :On the remote island of Chiloé in the late 19th century, an Indigenous girl named Rosa lives and works with her father on a farm. When the foreman brutally turns on Rosa’s father, she sets out for justice, seeking help from the king of a powerful organization of sorcerers.
潘阳
发表于1分钟前回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb