剧情简介
月嶋What if one of the best days of your life suddenly turned into your very worst nightmare? And what if you were forced to relive that same day again and again?
月嶋明视频
月嶋What if one of the best days of your life suddenly turned into your very worst nightmare? And what if you were forced to relive that same day again and again?
谈莉娜
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
袁凤瑛
回复 :本片利用采访和罕见的档案镜头，记录了刘易斯60多年来在民权、投票权、枪支管制、医疗改革和移民方面的社会活动和立法行动。根据现在对80岁的刘易斯的采访，探讨了他的童年经历，他鼓舞人心的家庭，以及他在1957年与马丁·路德·金博士的决定性会面。
沐尔
回复 :阿尔瓦罗（哈维尔·古铁雷斯 Javier Gutiérrez 饰）是在公证处里上班的小小职员，拿着一份非常微博的薪水，常年生活在贫穷之中。虽然生活压力巨大，但是阿尔瓦罗依然怀揣着成为作家的梦想，无奈阿尔瓦罗实在是一个没有什么写作天赋的男人，所以直到今天，这个梦想依然孕育在襁褓之中。阿曼达（玛利亚·莱昂 María León 饰）是阿尔瓦罗的妻子，和丈夫的平庸恰恰相反，阿曼达随随便便的写了一本书，哪知道一炮而红。充满了困惑的阿尔瓦罗向自己的老师胡安（安东尼奥·德·拉·托雷 Antonio de la Torre 饰）请教成名秘诀，胡安告诉阿尔瓦罗，想要写出好的故事，必须从现实里取材。
