陈兰丽
发表于8分钟前回复 :议员瑞查得(约翰·斯坦丁 John Standing 饰)和妻子克罗丽萨(瓦妮莎·雷德格瑞夫 Vanessa Redgrave 饰)结婚已经三十余年了,彼此之间感情十分稳定。克罗丽萨正在准备一场盛大而奢华的宴会,这样的“工作”她已经进行了无数次,自然将一切打点得井井有条。一位名为彼得(艾伦·考克斯 Alan Cox 饰)不速之客的出现让克罗丽萨的思绪回到了从前,彼时,她是风华正茂的少女,遇见了同样年轻英俊的彼得,两人情投意合,在一起度过了一段难忘的快乐时光。然而,瑞查得的出现却彻底改变了这一对佳偶的命运,最终,克罗丽萨选择了瑞查得,失望的彼得远走他乡。如今,彼得再度回到了克罗丽萨的身边,克罗丽萨发现,一种久违的激情和火热在胸中来回攒动。
梁朝伟
发表于9分钟前回复 :年轻的男同性恋阿哲(柯宇伦)对同龄人不感兴趣,爱上在游泳馆游泳时总是一言不发旁若无人的已婚男人冯伟(陈锦鸿),然而因为自信的缺失,他没敢同冯伟表白,而是借助与冯伟的妻子月纹(邱淑贞)发生性关系,在想象中完成与他的肌肤之亲。月纹的意外死亡令冯伟想起之前两人冷淡的关系,明白到月纹在心中所占分量,陷入自责中不能自拔,陪在他身边暗恋他的基佬(曾志伟)虽心疼却也不敢表示出太过直白的关心,只能规劝凡事想开慢慢会好。阿哲亦觉自己应为月纹的死负一定责任,愧疚地逃到台北,偶遇外形同月纹不差的rose(邱淑贞),借醉酒将自己的压抑吐出之后,rose要他对心诚实,可是她又有着怎样的心事,又是如何排解,却是无人能知。
马浚伟
发表于6分钟前回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb