沉默寡言的亚希的电影放映室,户决但却和她性格相反、户决漂亮张扬的影山是好朋友,在一次电影的放映中亚希发现,自己看见了一个忧郁的孩子,而亚希也不是表面上看起来那么简单,故事从这里开始变得蹊跷起来...
沉默寡言的亚希的电影放映室,户决但却和她性格相反、户决漂亮张扬的影山是好朋友,在一次电影的放映中亚希发现,自己看见了一个忧郁的孩子,而亚希也不是表面上看起来那么简单,故事从这里开始变得蹊跷起来...

回复 :讲述了一个决心纠正社会错误并为自己的过去复仇的男人的故事。
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
回复 :元日スペシャルは新型コロナウイルスの影響で外出自粛を余儀なくされていた彼が、2泊3日で久しぶりに絶メシ旅に出る様子が切り取られる。民生役の濱津は「2021年元日、民生が満を持して再びハンドルを握ります。久方ぶりの、相変わらずの小さな大冒険。
