茱莉亚（劳拉·里根 Laura Regan 饰）是一位心理学系的学生，看午成绩优异的她正在准备着毕业论文的答辩工作，看午前途一片光明。某天夜晚，茱莉亚意外的接到了儿时好友比利（乔·阿布拉汉姆斯 Jon Abrahams 饰）打来的电话，比利的声音听上去充满了绝望与恐惧，他告诉茱莉亚，有某些邪恶而又恐怖的生物躲在黑暗之中，随时准备向他发起进攻，之后，比利自杀了。在比利的葬礼上，茱莉亚与比利的大学校友山姆（伊桑·恩布里 Ethan Embry 饰）和特里（达格玛拉·多敏齐克 Dagmara Dominczyk 饰）相遇了，让茱莉亚感到震惊的是，山姆和特里竟然拥有着和比利相似的遭遇，勇敢的茱莉亚决定将此事调查个水落石出。
回复 :阿斯特拉罕羊皮取自初生黑羊，刚出娘胎即面临残酷命运。十二岁男孩被送到乡间的寄养家庭，别人看他桀骜不驯，看不见他的受伤灵魂。寄养家长认为他难以管教，但为了领取津贴，维持着痛苦关系。大卫狄柏塞维利亚首部长片，于家乡取景，向莫里斯皮亚勒的《赤裸的童年》取经，对法国的寄养制度作出含蓄批评。落花有意流水无情，乡村生活潜藏性与暴力，甚至恋童暗示，终于在巴哈〈羔羊赞〉的烘托下，男孩内心煎熬与渴望倾泻而出，激荡出复杂又强烈的情感。
回复 :落魄男克雷格深陷重重债务，和三五好友借酒消愁。酒性大发之际，为还债务答应参加朋友的打赌。于是，一而再，再而三地犯下种种不可挽回的弥天大错。为了钱，他真的豁出去了。但有了钱，他还能回归以往的平静生活么。
张永智
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb