剧情简介
来自山村，造物主却爱好古玩的“老七”，造物主带着侄子“小七”在城市里做瓦匠老七希望能赚到钱，在城市里买上房子，然后把老娘、妻女接来共同生活，再给侄子找一个城里姑娘做媳妇。而他的侄子小七，却一心想着攒够三万元钱就回山村，完成他和乡村女教师秀花的梦想：给山村孩子们盖上宽敞的教室。叔侄俩为一去一留斗智斗勇。
造物主
来自山村，造物主却爱好古玩的“老七”，造物主带着侄子“小七”在城市里做瓦匠老七希望能赚到钱，在城市里买上房子，然后把老娘、妻女接来共同生活，再给侄子找一个城里姑娘做媳妇。而他的侄子小七，却一心想着攒够三万元钱就回山村，完成他和乡村女教师秀花的梦想：给山村孩子们盖上宽敞的教室。叔侄俩为一去一留斗智斗勇。
黄湘怡
回复 :该剧以真实事件为基础，分为两个时间段，讲述了导致谋杀和审判的事件。雷(巴勒特饰)和他23岁的弟弟内森(塔皮饰)在刺伤母亲的伴侣后被捕。无论什么情况下导致孩子杀人，法律是明确的:刑事责任的年龄是10岁，12岁时，雷必须在成人法庭接受审判。搬到他母亲维罗妮卡的家和他23岁的哥哥内森在一起，雷目睹了一场争吵，升级为他母亲的伴侣斯科特对他的兄弟进行的暴力斧头攻击。虽然被逮捕和审判，斯科特被无罪释放，并很快返回住在家里。家庭生活开始恶化，内森变得孤僻，不关心自己的健康和外表，而雷越来越承担起照顾的角色——为了内森，为了他的母亲，为了他的兄弟姐妹，维罗妮卡和斯科特的年幼的孩子。一天晚上，当男孩们听说斯科特威胁要再拿斧头时，兄弟俩对他发动了袭击，残忍地杀死了他。谋杀发生后，两兄弟被逮捕，并被指控犯有谋杀罪。内森和雷是分开的，因为他们进入司法系统，并满足各自的法律团队。Ray的团队由辩护律师Kerry Stephens领导，负责Ray在寄养家庭的安置(由于他的年龄和“被照顾的孩子”的身份)，等待他和他的兄弟一起在成人法庭受审。克里和她的团队准备了雷的辩护——他们会争辩说，雷在袭击当晚失去了控制，应该被判过失杀人罪而不是谋杀罪。随着审判的开始，他们发现内森的辩护团队已经决定内森不应该作证，让雷独自站在证人席上，为自己的辩护提供证据。
蔡健雅
回复 :电视台战争胜局已定，火星台两个受欢迎节目“乜太与李”和“开心字典”，以百分之百收视击败败领台地球台，火星台节目主持人兼老板乜也气焰高涨，除了对自己属下员工荷刻之余，并想吞并地球台。正所为有人欢喜有人愁，地球台李老板竟要跳楼造新闻，增加收视，幸好女儿亚MAY赶至，令李老板回心转意，这时乜太来电，冷嘲热讽，李老板受不住刺激血管爆裂入院，要女儿挽救地球台。
吴宇凯
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
