邓曼茹
发表于4分钟前回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
刘冰
发表于3分钟前回复 :维杰(阿贾耶·德乌干 Ajay Devgan 饰)和妻子娜蒂尼(施芮娅·萨兰 Shreya 饰)结婚多年,将两个女儿安久(伊西塔·杜塔 Ishita Dutta 饰)和安努(莫伦诺·贾达夫 Mrunal Jadhav 饰)抚养长大,一家人过着宁静的生活,平淡之中自有真味 。某日,安久去参加野营,结识了名为萨姆(Rishabh Chaddha 饰)的男生,此时的她并不知道的是,这位看上去文质彬彬的男孩,会彻底粉碎她的生活。撕下了伪善面具的萨姆竟然想要强暴安久,在激烈的挣扎反抗之中,安久失手杀死萨姆。维杰决定挺身而出保护他无辜的家人,自小热爱看电影的他利用从电影里学到的知识对萨姆的尸体进行了处理和掩埋,但警察的来访让这个家庭再一次陷入了危机之中。